Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Act, no suit against a person in whom property has become vested if trust for any specific purpose, or against his legal representatives or assigns (not being assigns for valuable consideration), for the purpose of following in his or their hands such property, or the proceeds thereof or for an account of such property or proceeds, shall be barred by any length of time.

Explanation – For the purposes of this section any property comprised in a Hindu, Muslim or Buddhist religious or charitable endowment shall be deemed to be property vested in trust for a specific purpose and the manager of the property shall be deemed to be the trusted thereof.

 

 

 

 

 

Explanatory Video on Section – 10. Suits against trustees and their representatives

Notes on Section – 10. Suits against trustees and their representatives

Questions on Section – 10. Suits against trustees and their representatives

 

Juris Crack provide free law notes , free video lecture , relevant mock questions , past MCQ question and legal news on The Limitation Act 1963. One stop destination for llb students, judicial service examination preparation , civil judge preparation , law officer courses , apo preparation , clat ug and pg test preparation. We provide notes on all legal topics , past years questions and preparation strategy. Our Bilingual teaching materials help all law students to plan better for their examination. Juris Crack resource are mostly free to use and download, so that community of law students get quality materials. Become member of Juris Crack Law Community.

 

Section – 10. Suits against trustees and their representatives  -. Bare Act of The Limitation Act 1963 on JurisCrack with Case Laws and Video lecture

 

No comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *