(1) Whenever the accused is examined by a Metropolitan Magistrate, the Magistrate shall make a memorandum of the substance of the examination of the accused in the language of the Court and such memorandum shall be signed by the Magistrate and shall form part of the record.

(2) Whenever the accused is examined by any Magistrate other than a Metropolitan Magistrate, or by a
Court of Session, the whole of such examination, including every question put to him and every answer
given by him, shall be recorded in full by the presiding Judge or Magistrate himself or where he is unable
to do so owing to a physical or other incapacity, under his direction and superintendence by an officer of the
Court appointed by him in this behalf.

(3) The record shall, if practicable, be in the language in which the accused is examined or, if that is not
practicable, in the language of the Court.

(4) The record shall be shown or read to the accused, or, if he does not understand the language in which it
is written, shall be interpreted to him in a language which he understands, and he shall be at liberty to explain
or add to his answers.

(5) It shall thereafter be signed by the accused and by the Magistrate or presiding Judge, who shall certify
under his own hand that the examination was taken in his presence and hearing and that the record contains a full and true account of the statement made by the accused.

(6) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to the examination of an accused person in the course
of a summary trial.

No comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.