When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect.
Illustration
A instigates B to cause grievous hurt to Z. B, in consequence of the instigation, causes grievous hurt to Z. Z dies in consequence. Here, if A knew that the grievous hurt abetted was likely to cause death, A is liable to be punished with the punishment provided for murder.
Explanatory Video on Section – 113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor
Notes on Section – 113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor
Questions on Section – 113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor
Juris Crack provide free law notes , free video lecture , relevant mock questions , past MCQ question and legal news on Indian Penal Code 1860. One stop destination for llb students, judicial service examination preparation , civil judge preparation , law officer courses , apo preparation , clat ug and pg test preparation. We provide notes on all legal topics , past years questions and preparation strategy. Our Bilingual teaching materials help all law students to plan better for their examination. Juris Crack resource are mostly free to use and download, so that community of law students get quality materials. Become member of Juris Crack Law Community.
Section – 113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor-. Bare Act of Indian Penal Code 1860 on JurisCrack with Case Laws and Video lecture
No comment