Where a lease of immovable property has been determined by forfeiture for a breach of an express condition which provides that on breach thereof the lessor may re-enter, no suit for ejectment shall lie unless and until the lessor has served on the lessee a notice in writing-
(a) specifying the particular breach complained of; and
(b) if the breach is capable of remedy, requiring the lessee to remedy the breach, and the lessee fails, within a reasonable time from the date of the service of the notice, to remedy the breach, if it is capable of remedy.
Nothing in this section shall apply to an express condition against the assigning, under-letting, parting with the possession, or disposing, of the property leased, or to an express condition relating to forfeiture in case of non-payment of rent.
Explanatory Video on Section – 114A. Relief against forfeiture in certain other cases
Notes on Section – 114A. Relief against forfeiture in certain other cases
Questions on Section – 114A. Relief against forfeiture in certain other cases
Juris Crack provide free law notes , free video lecture , relevant mock questions , past MCQ question and legal news on The Transfer of Property Act 1882. One stop destination for llb students, judicial service examination preparation , civil judge preparation , law officer courses , apo preparation , clat ug and pg test preparation. We provide notes on all legal topics , past years questions and preparation strategy. Our Bilingual teaching materials help all law students to plan better for their examination. Juris Crack resource are mostly free to use and download, so that community of law students get quality materials. Become member of Juris Crack Law Community.
Section – 114A. Relief against forfeiture in certain other cases -. Bare Act of The Transfer of Property Act 1882 on JurisCrack with Case Laws and Video lecture
No comment