(1) Where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or defendant is substituted or added, the suit shall, as regards him, be deemed to have been instituted when he was made a party:
Provided that were the court is satisfied that the omission to include a new plaintiff or defendant was due to a mistake in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to a case where a party is added or substituted owing to assignment or devolution of any interest during the tendency of a suit or where a plaintiff is made a defendant or a defendant is made a plaintiff
Explanatory Video on Section – 21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant
Notes on Section – 21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant
Questions on Section – 21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant
Juris Crack provide free law notes , free video lecture , relevant mock questions , past MCQ question and legal news on The Limitation Act 1963. One stop destination for llb students, judicial service examination preparation , civil judge preparation , law officer courses , apo preparation , clat ug and pg test preparation. We provide notes on all legal topics , past years questions and preparation strategy. Our Bilingual teaching materials help all law students to plan better for their examination. Juris Crack resource are mostly free to use and download, so that community of law students get quality materials. Become member of Juris Crack Law Community.
Section – 21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant -. Bare Act of The Limitation Act 1963 on JurisCrack with Case Laws and Video lecture
No comment