Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) may be admitted after the prescribed period, if the appellant or the applicant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period.
Explanation – The fact that the appellant or the applicant was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause within the meaning of this section.
Comment : “We do not find any cogent ground given in the application for condonation of delay which in law can constitute sufficient cause to explain the inordinate delay in filing of the special leave petitions.” Warlu, Appellant v. Gangotribai AIR 1994 SUPREME COURT 466
Explanatory Video on Section – 5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases
Notes on Section – 5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases
Questions on Section – 5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases
Juris Crack provide free law notes , free video lecture , relevant mock questions , past MCQ question and legal news on The Limitation Act 1963. One stop destination for llb students, judicial service examination preparation , civil judge preparation , law officer courses , apo preparation , clat ug and pg test preparation. We provide notes on all legal topics , past years questions and preparation strategy. Our Bilingual teaching materials help all law students to plan better for their examination. Juris Crack resource are mostly free to use and download, so that community of law students get quality materials. Become member of Juris Crack Law Community.
Section – 5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases -. Bare Act of The Limitation Act 1963 on JurisCrack with Case Laws and Video lecture
No comment