When language use in a documents is plain it itself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts, evidence may be given to show that it was in a peculiar sense.
Illustrations
A sells to B, by deed, “my house in Calcutta”
A had no house in Calcutta, but it appears that he had a house at Howrah, of which B had been in possession since the execution of the deed.
These facts may be proved to show that the deed related to the house at Howrah.
Explanatory Video on -95. Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Notes on – 95. Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Questions on – 95. Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Juris Crack provide free law notes , free video lecture , relevant mock questions , past MCQ question and legal news on Indian Evidence Act 1872. One stop destination for llb students , judicial service examination preparation , civil judge preparation , law officer courses , apo preparation , clat ug and pg test preparation. We provide notes on all legal topics , past years questions and preparation strategy. Our Bilingual teaching materials helps all law students to plan better for their examination. Juris Crack resource are mostly free to use and download , so that community of law students get quality materials. Become member of Juris Crack Law Community
Section – 95. Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts. Bare Act of Indian Evidence Act 1872 on JurisCrack
No comment